One Time Services · Answer visibility

Know where the brand enters the answer—and why.

A versioned baseline across answer engines, crawler access, retrieval, citations, named mentions, recommendation language, source influence and competitor advantage.

Price

₹1,50,000

Timeline

20 business days

Scope

One category · 6 engines

Get started →Inspect the scope

Selected experience

JioMart

Traveloka

Justdial

Dubizzle

Adpost

Business Index

McSport

Cox & Cox

Stoov

CAIA Cosmetics

Snocks

Microsoft Azure

Agoda Philippines

As cited on

Search Engine Land

Moz

Backlinko

Yoast

Coursera

Brand marks identify prior team experience or citations. Case outcomes are reported with named attribution only where the client has approved it.

The buying decision

Know when this is the narrowest useful engagement.

One-time work is valuable when it resolves a named decision and leaves an implementation-ready handoff.

Use it when

Leadership wants a defensible answer-visibility baseline, category competitors are being cited, or AI traffic is discussed without prompt evidence.

Do not use it when

The site is not crawlable, the product truth is unstable, or the team expects a guaranteed citation from a one-time rewrite.

Decision it resolves

Which engines, prompts, sources, pages and entity signals deserve investment first?

Scope lenses

Six lenses. One decision-ready answer.

Every material finding needs source evidence, an affected cohort, business relevance, a recommended action, a named owner and a way to validate the release.

01 · EVIDENCE LENS

Crawler access

Search and citation crawler rules, training-control distinctions, robots conflicts, rendered access and server evidence.

02 · EVIDENCE LENS

Prompt universe

Stable prompt groups by buyer state, market, language, category question, comparison and recommendation intent.

03 · EVIDENCE LENS

Outcome classes

Eligibility, retrieval, citation, named mention, description, recommendation and attributable action kept analytically separate.

04 · EVIDENCE LENS

Source graph

Which owned and independent sources engines repeatedly retrieve, cite or use to corroborate category claims.

05 · EVIDENCE LENS

Entity + evidence

Organisation, product, people, claims, methods, authorship, structured data and reference assets that clarify the brand.

06 · EVIDENCE LENS

Competitor advantage

Prompt-by-prompt differences in answer inclusion, source authority, page structure, evidence and recommendation language.

What the work looks like

The diagnosis is visible before the recommendation.

GEO answer observatoryBASELINE CAPTURED

Primary view

Versioned prompts180 · 6 engines · 4 buyer states

Eligible166

Retrieved104

Cited42

Priority decisions

01Competitor source dominanceHIGH

02Crawler policy conflictP0

03Missing quotable evidenceP1

Share of Model

7.8%

Citation share

5.1%

Priority gaps

How the engagement runs

A bounded process with inspectable exits.

01Week 01
Access + baseline
Confirm crawler policy, markets, buyer questions, competitors and the engine/version capture protocol.
Inspectable output
Crawler + prompt register
02Week 02
Observe answers
Run the versioned panel, preserve responses, classify outcomes and map cited source families.
Inspectable output
Answer evidence warehouse
03Week 03
Diagnose gaps
Reconcile answer behavior with eligible pages, entity signals, original evidence and independent corroboration.
Inspectable output
Citation opportunity map
04Week 04
Prioritise action
Specify page, source, crawler, entity and measurement changes with owners and 90-day sequencing.
Inspectable output
Executive GEO roadmap

What you receive

Not a deck to admire. A handoff to use.

01

Versioned prompt panel

02

Engine-by-engine baseline

03

Cited source graph

04

Entity + evidence register

05

Competitor answer breakdown

06

Citation opportunity map

07

GEO measurement contract

08

90-day GEO roadmap

Access and boundaries

Clarity before the clock starts.

We need from your team

Evidence, access and an owner.

Crawler policy access
Analytics + Search Console
Category and competitor list
Buyer question sources
Named owner for handoff

Not included

No hidden implementation promise.

Guaranteed citations
Content production at scale
Unlimited engine re-runs
Continuous prompt monitoring

Relevant impact preview

The operating change behind the metric.

B2B SAAS

US + UK

EXPLORE OUR IMPACT →

A pre-launch company became a cited answer before it became a search incumbent.

Entity signals, expert authorship, structured evidence and independent corroboration were sequenced against the highest-intent prompt families before the brand had meaningful backlink authority.

41% Share of Model (from 6%)

+312% cited mentions

3rd → 1st in category prompts

Named in AI comparisons

9-month founder-supplied working record; production publication requires approved evidence.

Commercial clarity

One decision. One transparent price.

GEO + AI Visibility Audit

₹1,50,000 · 20 business days

One category · 6 engines. GST additional. The published price assumes the scope and dependencies described on this page.

Get started →

Start with a structured intake—not a checkout cart. Send the company and contact details. We review fit, confirm access and boundaries, and return a precise start plan.

Questions before you buy

The useful caveats, up front.

ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot as the default panel. Additional engines are added when the category demands them.